Transition Whatcom



People for a new investigation of 9/11



3, 354 architects and engineers more than 15,000 scientists, including 52 Nobel laureates and 63 recipients of the National Medal of Science, some 320 skilled commercial of military pilots (Pilots for 9/11 Truth), and some 58 elected public officials are saying that scientific irrefutably evidence proves that the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed by explosives and incendiaries.


Video classes Part 2, about the science of 9/11 truth


Part 3


Part 1



There is also a video of yellow colored steel dripping off the side of the south Twin Tower just before it collapsed. It is not aluminum metal because it is silver color as a liquid.

9/11 Whistleblower: Kevin Ryan former UL scientist


“But someone would have talked by now”


The 9/11 Commission whistleblowers


9/11 Whistleblower: Michael Springmann


9/11 Whistleblowers: William Rodriguez



The New Pearl Harbor revisited


Analysis of the outer box columns being propelled outwardly away from the center core columns at too fast a speed or acceleration



Steel melts at 2,750 degree F. See the photo of yellow hot steel (2,192 F.) being removed from the WTC wreckage at


Fire Fighters for 9/11 truth



My book:  The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS
66 pages

send me an email at and I will reply with it attach for free.


or For sale at Amazon Kindle books

We are in a war on science.   


Richard McManus
Chief Warrant Officer-3/counterintelligence special agent  (more like an FBI agent than CIA officer)  and combat paramedic/LPN, Vietnam US Army retired, BS psychology and nursing, Everett, WA, USA  (near Seattle), former Seattle PD 911 telephone guy and King County cop

Views: 94

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


Jim Hoffman’s Feb. 9th 2005 criticism of the March 2005 Popular Mechanics attack article regarding 9/11 skeptics.


The article's approach is to identify and attack a series of claims which it asserts represent the whole of 9/11 skepticism. It gives the false impression that these claims, several of which are clearly absurd, represent the breadth of challenges to the official account of the flights, the World Trade Center attack, and the Pentagon attack. Meanwhile it entirely ignores vast bodies of evidence showing that only insiders had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out the attack.


The Popular Mechanics article presents specious claims to divert the reader from understanding the (very complex) issues (raised by some 3,354 architects and engineers, skilled commercial pilots, and numerous scientists).

The article brackets its distortion of the issues highlighted by 9/11 skeptics with smears against the skeptics themselves, whom it dehumanizes and accuses of "disgracing the memories" of the victims…More important, (their article) it misrepresents skeptics' views. In fact much of the 9/11 skeptic community has been working to expose many of these unscientific claims as silly and run counter to high school physics and chemistry.

In this article James Meigs wrote in an editor notes section, (the 9/11 skeptics are) “disgracing the memories of the thousands who died that day.” And the 9/11 skeptics “deliberately falsified” facts.

My comment: Why would some 3,354 architects and engineers, skilled commercial pilots, and numerous scientists want to waste their time deliberately falsifying facts for the past 19 years?


But we know for damn sure no human pilot could have hit the Twin Towers, according to experience commercial pilots, and none of the alleged hijackers could have flown into the Pentagon based on their flight training records. And how did the alleged hijackers know all the Air Force and/or FAA war games would be on-going and where the radar holes could hide them flying off course? How could the top sections of the Twin Towers crushed its lower floor if so much weight of concrete floors and steel went flying off its sides and the upper floors were made with thinner steel? Microscopic red/gray chips of nano-thermite, iron rich microspheres, molten steel in the wreckage which was burning too hot for too long producing only white smoke, (aluminum oxide), and Ted Olsen’s lying about a phone call from his wife, who was allegedly on AA77 as it flew at some 30,000 feet above sea level. We cannot discount the very extreme and unusual stock market trading, put-opinions nor dance Israelis, Lucky Larry saying “just pull it”,


Part B

The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001, recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO).  They concluded that only strong explosives could be the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low frequencies. According to the nature of the recorded waves (body and surface waves), we can propose a location of each explosive source. According to the presence of shear waves or the presence of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean or a subaerial explosion. The magnitude of an aerial explosion is insufficient to provide seismic waves at 34 km.

The witnesses and video observation confirm our conclusions of subaerial explosions close to the times of aircraft impacts on WTC1 and WTC2, a strong subterranean explosion closely correlated with the WTC1 collapse, and subaerial explosions closely correlated with the WTC2 and WTC7 collapses, WTC7 not having been hit by a plane. As a consequence, we draw the conclusion that the three buildings were demolished by a controlled process. (Source:  Dr. Andre Rousseau, November 1, 2012)


A 0.9 earthquake occurred near the North Tower 14 seconds prior to the AA11 impacted, per NTSB data within the 9/11 Commission report.


A 0.7 earthquake occurred near the South Tower 17 seconds before the UA175 impacted (per NTSB data)


There was 100,000 tons of steel blown 600 feet away from the base of the building in all four directions.  That means none of this weight could have been crushing the lower floors.  Additionally, 90,000 tons of concrete turned to dust and it was blown downwind covering three square mile area with 2 to 3 inches of dust.  The dust also included iron microsphere in a very high ratio along with dust made of concrete.  You will not see any large chunks of the concrete floor and the steel corrugated pans or re-bar into which the cement was poured.  All the concrete floors were turned into dust or sand and only a few softball size pieces of concrete were removed from the wreckage at the Fresh-kill landfill.


Witnesses reported they felt the ground shake moments before the beginning of the collapse. In August 2006, Dr. Graeme MacQueen, a retired professor from McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, published the article, 118 Witnesses: The Firefighters’ Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers. In it, he identified 118 FDNY members (out of the 503 interviewed) who reported witnessing explosions. The FDNY had recorded the oral histories between October 2001 and January 2002 at the instruction of the City’s fire commissioner, Thomas Von Essen.


The 118 witnesses say they observed flashes of light and sounds of explosions. One witness stated he/she saw flashes of light inside the building somewhere between the floors 10 thru 15 before the state of the tower collapsed.


Why hasn’t Condoleezza Rice been prosecuted?



EPA’s Office of the Inspector General also discovered that the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) significantly revised EPA press releases “to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones.”  Asbestos levels were double to triple EPA’s danger limit.   White House Council on Environmental Quality changed the EPA press release to  “slightly above” the limit.”  EPA was instructed to clear all statements to the media through the National Security Council, giving National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice’s office final approval.

The Sierra Club charges that the Bush administration was guilty of reckless disregard by failing to inform Ground Zero area workers, residents and rescuers of health risks from toxic air after the collapse of the World Trade Center.  And the EPA called the Sierra Club report “a blatant attempt to use this tragedy for political gain.”

The report titled "Air Pollution and Deception at Ground Zero" blames the thousands of cases of long-term respiratory illness among New Yorkers on the White House and the Environmental Protection Agency, saying they downplayed health risks, shirked their regulatory oversight roles and even urged financial district workers to return to their jobs prematurely.

Also EPA didn’t find hazards because they didn’t look for them and when they did find hazards they didn’t tell us - total deception and disregard!



A Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman cannot be held personally liable for any of her statements of reassurance about Ground Zero air quality, overruling a District Court judge who in 2006 called Whitman’s actions “shocking.”

First responders such as police officers and firefighters account for 91 percent of those battling an illness, Eighteen percent who have been awarded compensation have been diagnosed with cancer. 11,770 claimants were found eligible for compensation and the majority of recipients live in New York and New Jersey - 4,515 and 379, respectively.


The FBI did not do a DNA analysis of the Dugway produced anthrax samples (RMS-1029).  Bruce Ivans had some anthrax in a flask (a glass container) that contained RMS-1029 and he got it from Dugway Proving grounds, (Dugway anthrax).  Within Ivans’ flask in addition to containing RMS-1029 and it contained a different kind of anthrax.  This kind of anthrax Ivans made up himself.   Both kinds were classified as “wet anthrax.” 

The anthrax sent in the first set of letters (postmark dated September 18, 2001) was RMS-1029 and its DNA was tested.  This attack anthrax  had a specific and rare mutation in its DNA.   Therefore, there was at least 200 people who had access to the RMS-1029 anthrax, but the FBI did not search all the locations where this RMS-1029 anthrax could be found, and then the FBI should have, BUT DID NOT tested all anthrax at all locations to determine if its DNA had the specific fingerprint or characteristic. 

In the first series of anthrax attack letters there was also found a bacteria called bacillus subtilis.   Bacillus subtilis is a common contaminate in production runs at Dugway when they made anthrax.  Dugway was making anthrax in their effort to produce a vaccine.   But the FBI tested the bacillus subtilis and found a specific species of it, but they could not find samples of anthrax that contained any of this species of bacillus subtilis. 

Also the first wave of letters containing anthrax also had silicon but most of the silicon was outside the anthrax spores.   RMS-1029 contained no silicon, therefore that ruled out Bruce Ivans as a suspect..  The second wave of anthrax attack letters (dated October 9, 2001) also contain silicon, but most of it was inside the spores.  It was pointed out to US Congress people that the silicon and the bacillus subtilis pointed to someone else other than Bruce Ivans.  At a September 2008 Congressional hearing FBI Director Mueller was asked how he had rule out Dugway Proving Ground in central Utah; Battelle Memorial Institute in Columbus, Ohio from the list of suspects, and several months later Mueller responded to the Congressional committee with a response that makes no sense.

Former FBI agent, Richard L. Lambert, who ran the anthrax investigation for four years,  filed a lawsuit accusing the bureau and the Justice Department of forcing his dismissal from a job as senior counterintelligence officer ... in retaliation for his dissent on the anthrax case

After Bruce Ivans died the FBI knew the anthrax had not come from Fort Detrick.

The equipment to make such high-tech (dry) anthrax does not exist at Fort Detrick, where Ivins worked. People who work at Fort Detrick have confirmed this. In other words, a lone scientist couldn't have done it without the support of a whole government laboratory. And Fort Detrick was not one such potential laboratory.

Richard O. Spertzel said,"In my opinion, there are maybe four or five people in the whole country who might be able to make this stuff, and I'm one of them," And even with a good lab and staff to help run it, it might take me a year to come up with a product as good." In addition, scientists at Ft. Detrick say that no one there had the equipment or knowledge to make weaponized anthrax of the type used in the letters.

In February 2011, a National Academies of Sciences (NAS) report was critical of the FBI’s scientific investigation.  The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is a private, nonprofit organization of the country’s leading researchers.

And let us not forget that on September 30, 2001, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card made a public statement, that terrorists organization like al Qaeda probably have found the means to us biological or chemical warfare.  The same day, Sec/Def. Rumsfeld said terrorist could be equipped with the state sponsors with weapons of mass destruction.  And on the same day, Tommy Thompson Secretary of Health and Human Services stated spoke on CBS of a “bioterrorist attack.”This was before anyone knew about the anthrax letter attacks.

   William Patrick, a former top bio-scientist at Ft. Detrick and close colleague of former Giuliani OEM Director Jerry Hauer, was the mentor of initial FBI ‘person of interest’ in the anthrax attacks Steven Hatfill. Patrick holds five classified patents and trade secrets, including on how to hyper-weaponize anthrax to the 1 trillion spores per gram contained in the letters mailed to Democratic Congressional leaders Senators Daschle and Leahy. After leaving Ft. Detrick, he was contracted by Battelle to research and write a report on how mailed letters could be used as the vector for dispersing weaponized anthrax.


 On Sept. 9, two days before 9/11, Battelle contractor DIA announced the ‘success’ of Project Jefferson’s anthrax hyper-weaponization program. Following the Sept./Oct. 2001 letter mailings, some of which were reported to contain anthrax at 1 trillion spores per gram, a footnote in Patrick’s report stating that “We have now arrived at the point where we can purify [anthrax] to the extent of 1 trillion spores in a gram” was removed from publicly available copies.   


 William Patrick worked with his close colleague and friend, former Soviet bio-weapons expert Ken Alibek, at Battelle, which also ran Project Clear Vision, a secret CIA program to reverse engineer dry-powder anthrax bombs produced by the former Soviet Union. Patrick and Alibek were the FBI’s first suspects in the anthrax attacks, but the initial FBI investigative team was taken off that focus and replaced by a new team that diverted attention to Hatfill. Director Mueller himself assured a Senator that the FBI “was not investigating, nor intending to investigate, anyone with, or formerly with, BMI [Battelle]." 


 Battelle is also a contractual partner with BioPort and Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), and directs the anthrax production and experimentation program at the Army’s Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, the second home in addition to Ft. Detrick of the Ames strain contained in the letters. Hauer and Hatfill worked together at SAIC.


Given the timing, it is now almost certain that the U.S. government insider anthrax attacks were used as the pretext for President Bush’s illegal warrantless domestic wiretap program for which he signed the first ‘authorization’ on Oct. 23, 2001 – right in the middle of the anthrax terror.

  The fact that the Administration continued its secret and illegal domestic spying program long after its was publicly known that the anthrax attacks were the work of one of its own inside military facilities is strong evidence the perpetrators were the same high level officials who used the attacks to justify their illegal surveillance program – the White House itself.


I am charging Ted Olson with lying to the FBI

and the FBI and/or DoJ with covering up this crime.

After 9/11, the FBI interviewed Solicitor General of the United States Ted Olson called the FBI to report that his wife Barbara Olson had called him twice from Flight AA77 that crashed into the Pentagon.   Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology pretending to be his wife. 

At first he FBI falsely insisted there were 13 mobile phone calls made from some of hijacked airplanes, but later at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, they changed their story to just  two phone calls. 


In 2006 the FBI presented evidence at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui (the alleged 20th hijacker).  FBI exhibit P200054, from his trial showing that Barbara Olson made only one phone call -- it did not connect, and it lasted for 0 seconds.  There were no billing records for these two alleged calls.   

All the alleged cell phone calls are impossible because at an altitude of six miles up in the air (some 25,000 to 35,000 feet) a radio signal from a cell phone is too weak. Furthermore flying at 400 to 500 mph would not give the cell phone’s radio signal a chance to connect with cell phone towers on the ground.  It takes a second or two to connect to the new cell phone tower, do a hand-shake as it is called.  By the time, one handshake is completed to a tower, the jet has flown out of radio range and the call has to start all over to try doing another hand-shake. 


According to AT&T spokesperson Alexa Graf, cell phones are not designed for calls from the high altitudes at which most airliners normally operate. Graf said, “It was a miracle that any of the calls got through from that altitude.  An aircraft fuselage’s aluminum skin tend to block or attenuate electromagnetic radiation, radio frequency signals. One can make a cell phone call from inside an aircraft while on the ground because the weakened signal is still close enough to the nearest cell site to picked up the signal. Once above 10,000 feet, however, calls rarely get through, if ever.”

Here is the statement of an experienced airline pilot: “The idea of being able to use a cell phone while flying is completely impractical. Once through about 10,000 feet, the thing is useless, since you are too high and moving too fast for the phone to provide a signal.” (AVWeb, 1999)

Ted Olson (June 2001 to July 2004) and he told news agencies that his wife Barbara called him and that she told him that AA77 was being hijacked, and the hijackers had knives and box cutters.  This is the only evidence that the hijackers allegedly had those weapons.


Olson falsely alleged his wife told him that the hijackers were not aware of her phone call, and that they had put all the passengers in the back of the plane.  About a minute into the conversation, the call was cut off.  He also said, shortly after the first call, Barbara telephoned him again and reported that the pilot had announced that the flight had been hijacked.  She asked him what she should tell the captain to do.  Ted Olson said he asked her for the location of the airplane and she replied that the aircraft was then flying over houses. Another passenger told her they were traveling northeast.  Ted Olson than says he informed his wife of the two previous airplane crashes into the Twin Towers.  She did not display signs of panic and did not indicate any awareness of her airplane was going to crash.  At that point, the second call was cut off." (The 9/11 Commission Report)   (


Late in the day on 9/11, CNN put out this lie told by Ted Olson


A copy of the FBI’s report of their interview of Ted Olson was released per a FOIA request.  See:


In 2006, an American Airlines representative, in response to a query said, “We do not have (seatback or GTE Airfones) phones on our Boeing 757.”


So my question for you is why didn’t the FBI charge Ted Olson for lying to the FBI?

Lying to a federal official can get you five years in jail.


Video for the Ted Olsen lie.       


Reply to Discussion


© 2024   Created by David MacLeod.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service